Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Workers are the integral part of any organization, and their satisfaction matters a lot in the success of the organization. Personally, I agree with the statement that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. However, my viewpoint can be best understood after a meticulous discussion of the points relating to the statement.
First of all, different types of tasks maintain interest towards work throughout the day, which is an important thing to do any work effectively. When workers will do their work with full interest, they can provide more output to the company. Hence, it is in the benefit of both the workers as well as the company. For instance, when I was working with an health insurance company, the manager's strategy to improve the output was that he allotted specific time limit to specific tasks of the company. For example, an employee can spend the fixed time on one type of task like working on claim verification for two hours, claim settlement for three hours and payment for another three hours. This improved the efficiency of their work, as they have to complete the work in the fixed time limits of the day as well as they got change in the activities.
Secondly, workers learn different skills, which is important for their career growth. In this competitive world, companies look for multi-talented people, who are capable of perform various duties in the company. Variety of tasks will provide them different work experience, which will improve their chances of getting good job in the industry. For example, when I was doing internship in a corporate hospital, even though my project was related to human resources, I used to visit and learn things from other departments as well, which improved my knowleadge and thus I got priority in my job interview.
Above all, some might be of the opinion that doing similar tasks all day long is better option because it does not require much effort to do the same task again and again. But from my having diversity in work helps improving you skills like technical skills, communication skills, knowledge, time management skills etc.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that doing different types of tasks during the workday is better than doing similar tasks. This is because it not only keeps our interest towards work but also provides great experience and knowledge.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: For example, when I was doing internship in a corporate hospital, even though my project was related to human resources, I used to visit and learn things from other departments as well, which improved my knowleadge and thus I got priority in my job interview.
Error: knowleadge Suggestion: knowledge
-----------------------
flaws:
1. you like to use pronouns as the subjects of a sentence. specially when you use examples. so try to user something else as subject. like this sentence:
When workers will do their work with full interest, they can provide more output to the company.
revised:
Workers will provide more output to the company with full interest.
2. same sentence structure repeated, like 'which' you used:
work throughout the day, which is an important thing to do any work effectively.
workers learn different skills, which is important for their career growth.
provide them different work experience, which will improve their chances of getting good job in the industry.
3. also don't repeat phrases like: for example, for instance....
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 411 350
No. of Characters: 1986 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.503 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.832 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.41 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.558 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...t is in the benefit of both the workers as well as the company. For instance, when I was w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... For instance, when I was working with an health insurance company, the managers ...
^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...g with an health insurance company, the managers strategy to improve the output was that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to improve' or 'improve'.
Suggestion: to improve; improve
... from my having diversity in work helps improving you skills like technical skills, commu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97080291971 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65084683592 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506082725061 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8068519229 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.176470588 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389069179439 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130446294608 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17792741518 0.0737576698707 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240983946487 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129968682243 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.