Your friend is going to reduce living expenses, what of the following way would you recommend to your friend and why? Find a roommate or housemate to share the living expenses; buy some technology products(like the latest mobile phone) less frequently; shop for less expensive food to cook at home or go to the restaurant less frequently.
At some point of our life, like being student in the university or in early professional career, we may have to make a saving to balance our sheet. With the right way to minimize our spending, one would be able to afford high-priced stuffs such as a new vehicles or housing. To reduce our expenses can be executed by seeking a room companion, rarely updating a new gadget, or starting a home-cooking habit. To be frank, I believe the latest method will be resulting greater benefits which I will delve in these following paragraphs.
To begin with, look around for a new apartment partner might share the monthly rent which is resulting to decrease monthly spending. However, this comrade searching might even be a lengthy process and drain our energy and time, because finding it requires a character match. Otherwise, it would result a drawback than its cutting-cost effect. For example, if you are a melancholic and meet the partner whose sanguine, it can lead to a stressful day for both as the former want a self-meditation and the later always keen to chit-chat.
For the other technique, to lower the cost of living by lessen to upgrade an appliance might sound a hopeful prospect. By diminishing this post, we are relying on our current device. Still, the updating from the technology provide does not come in monthly. Additionally, it may take over a year for a new device to be released. Take an example for a new iPhone series, which seemingly being upgraded almost every two years. So that the saving for this practice might not be that much.
Compared to the earlier formula, I believe the best way to tighten our belt is by learning home-cooking. In regard to this statement, the food price served in an eating place costs double or even larger than cooking by ourselves, depending on the place and how comfy is in the inside. Take a sample from a heft-priced steak at the Steak 21, which around Rp 250,000.00 per serving, we can buy a fresh meat at local market and the seasoning and citing recipe from YouTube and delivering our own steak. This would cut out our expenditure post.
In conclusion, a homemade cooking experience could cut our half monthly spending budget and it is more effective than just finding a room confidant or stop upgrading the gadgets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'vehicle'?
Suggestion: vehicle
...afford high-priced stuffs such as a new vehicles or housing. To reduce our expenses can ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l delve in these following paragraphs. To begin with, look around for a new apart...
^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'fresh meat'.
Suggestion: fresh meat
...d Rp 250,000.00 per serving, we can buy a fresh meat at local market and the seasoning and c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, in regard to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76515151515 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71183787057 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0320184069 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3157894737 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0695866198956 0.236089414692 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215689953722 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.016923109197 0.0737576698707 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359284559802 0.150856017488 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205696420084 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.