Your school has received a gift of money What do you think is the best way for your school to spend this money Use specific reasons and details to support your choice
It is critically important that institutions of learning are financially underpinned by the government. This would enhance novel research that proffers solution to pressing challenges in the society most especially when the money received is diverted towards appropriate area. Personally, I believe that the best way my school can make use of gifted money is to spend it on facilities that will improve academic research. There are two reasons why I feel this way which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, one of the vital ways by which our society can become better is through unprecedented research in institutions of learning. When Universities have enough facilities for research, provisions would be made to ameliorate environmental challenges. My personal experience is a compelling example to illustrate this point. During my penultimate year of study, I carried out an investigation into the impacts of mining activities on the neighboring communities to an aggregate quarry. Among other threats posed by exploitation of minerals resources on the environment are dust emissions, ground vibration, and hazard due to fly-rock during blasting operations. To contain these problems, I created a model using artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the possibility of fly-rock prior to blasting operations. However, the prediction was not perfectly accurate because only a cracked version of the software was available in the department. It required a whooping sum of ten thousand dollars to buy the original version which the department could not afford. Fortunately, the state governor made a warm visit to the University and being an advocate of environmental safety, he gifted the department of Mining Engineering a sum of money. So, the faculty professors reached a concesus that the money should be diverted to pending novel research. Eventually, an original version of ANN was bought and I could successfully complete my research. Had the faculty members spent the money on something else, the problems caused my mining activities in the community might be left unsolved.
Furthermore, by carrying out timely investigations, a university tend to build her reputation within the country and the entire globe. For instance, after launching the best software for ANN in my department, other students were able to leverage on the opportunity to advance the frontiers of environmental safety in the department. Through problem solving academic projects, my institution was ranked the best university of technology in the country for three consecutive years while taking a second place in environmental and mining engineering among all universities in the world. This could not have been possible if the university had not diverted her gifted funds into appropriate research areas.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best way an institution can spend a gifted amount of money is to use it for novel academic projects. This is because research will help alleviate environmental challenges and as well take the university's reputation to higher niche.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2610.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4375 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15314822836 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8129653723 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157403479558 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469215352339 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610802932693 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125544473123 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661399705248 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.