In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod.
Both the lecture and the passage talks about whether the jar found in Iraq is the battery. The reading disapproves its authenticity not to be source of electric battery, but the lecture buttress it as battery by deducing three logical explanation.
first, the lecture says that the instrument found by the naïve people of the village not the archeologist. In addition, she opens a door that it may be battery by saying that people who got this may overlooked the other details which were associated with it; they might throw the wire and other stuff in the process. giving this explanation, she clearly resurgent the idea that the clay jar is first made battery.
Second, although she concedes that it is similar to the copper cylinder of the Seleucia which was used to carry the scroll, but argues its possibility of being battery. she hypothesizes that ancient people of iraq might realize that it could be used as battery if it was connected with copper or iron wire. this explanation brings the jar possibility as a battery.
Lastly, the speaker refuses the view which says that in the mean time, there was no use of battery ; so it is futile to say it as battery. Furthermore, she mentions that people might use it to make people believe in magic. On the other hand, she adds that it may be used as a medical procedure to give mild tingling sensation to the people. The electic function served as means of curing pain and ache may be strong enough to support the claim the jar as the battery.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...educing three logical explanation. first, the lecture says that the instrument f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Giving
...he wire and other stuff in the process. giving this explanation, she clearly resurgent...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...rgues its possibility of being battery. she hypothesizes that ancient people of ira...
^^^
Line 9, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...was connected with copper or iron wire. this explanation brings the jar possibility ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, may, second, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68796992481 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50835129686 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7918193714 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.916666667 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899006285047 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421443718204 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392499774765 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620565097387 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282550494518 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.