an advertising technique which is called bazzing
The text discusses an advertising tactic which is called Buzzing, and explains how this tactic can be bad for society and consumers. On the other hand, the lecturer who is a part time buzzer states that claims of the text is misleading, and provides some reasons to support the tactic of buzzing.
First, the text states that it is consumer's right to know if a person is a buzzer, and is paid to advertise the product. It adds that if the people know this point, they will not believe everything they hear easily, because they do not expect to hear the truth of a person who is a buzzer. The lecturer refutes this point and says that people will not accept all they hear as a truth. He also states that those people who do buzzing have actually used the product before, and because they liked the product try to buzz it. As the lecturer, for this reason we can not say that they are just some paid individuals to say something unreal.
Second, the text claims that when people do not know that the person who is talking to them is a buzzer, they will listen less critically, and may accept the claims made by the buzzer easier. The lecturer goes against this point and states that it is not true to say that people will believe everything that buzzer tells them. We can also hear from him that people will always ask lots of questions like the price or services of the product, and if the buzzer do not know all the answers, people will not believe and trust him.
Third, the text claims that buzzing is harmful for social relationships, and when people realized some of the people who talked to them were buzzer, they will not trust others anymore. The lecturer rejects this claim and states that buzzers do this job because they were satisfied by the product, and want to help others to feel the same. He also adds that when people buy the product and feel that how much it is good, they feel good and truth other people more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-19 | alta | 81 | view |
| 2018-08-09 | nastaran1992 | 65 | view |
| 2018-08-09 | nastaran1992 | 3 | view |
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- high school students should be required to have three years of studying a foreign language 77
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
- advantages and disadvantages of using smart cars 80
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...n the other hand, the lecturer who is a part time buzzer states that claims of the text i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...relationships, and when people realized some of the people who talked to them were buzzer, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 25.0 12.0772626932 207% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44943820225 5.08290768461 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11344252659 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415730337079 0.540411800872 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.51434878587 528% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.0875838531 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0420899706496 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234075757833 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643471289268 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427005631892 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645593701304 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 53.8541721854 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.