Both the reading passage and lecturer is talking about theories relating to extinction of dinosaurs. The passage states three important theories that clarifies causes of their extinction. However, the lecturer tries to refutes them all by providing well explained proofs.
First, the passage states asteroids were responsible for their extinction. It explains how availability of Iridium in Earth's surface is relatable to their extinction. It is theorized that, as Iridium is less available in earth and highly available in meteorites, there was meteor shower during the age of dinosaur. Which eventually, extinctic them. On the contrary, the lecturer claims that these Iridium were available on earth's crust because of volcanic ashes. These ashes transferred Iridium from lower earth crust. So, the asteroid theory is not convenient.
Second, the passage explains how low temperature and extreme climatic condition during ice age might have aided in extinction of dinosaurs. It states that becuse of poor thermoregulatory system of dinosaur their habitat and daily activities were influence which aided in their extinctin. But, the lectures debukes it by saying there was no any fossil evidience available to support this. Instead, fossilized evidiences proved that the climate during that period was tropical. The seal level was higher at that period and also most foosils dated to that period were of tropical plants which supports the point of the lecturer.
Finally, the passage states that evolution of dinosaur into bird caused their extinction. The passage proves it by stating how compareable were their body structures, complexicity and vita organs. But, the lecturer argues it by stating their body size were not compareable to support evolution. In addition, their mobility were also different. Dinosours had few range for their movement but, since birds could fly they were able move long distance and suvive harsh condition in an area by moving to other. This uncompromisingly proves that dinosurs didn't evolve into birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'refute'.
Suggestion: refute
...inction. However, the lecturer tries to refutes them all by providing well explained pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this Iridium' or 'these iridiums'?
Suggestion: this Iridium; these iridiums
... the contrary, the lecturer claims that these Iridium were available on earths crust because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...lectures debukes it by saying there was no any fossil evidience available to suppo...
^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun range seems to be countable; consider using: 'few ranges'.
Suggestion: few ranges
...lity were also different. Dinosours had few range for their movement but, since birds cou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s uncompromisingly proves that dinosurs didnt evolve into birds.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, in addition, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74189798044 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9355053425 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1428571429 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145957060506 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458625218506 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298783830686 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882572438671 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162316240882 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.