The author of the reading passage proposes three solutions that could help to decrease a number of cases when birds are injured, trying to fly thought glass windows.
The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that none of the solutions will resolve the problem.
In the reading, the author begins with stating that, one-way glasses that are transperant only one direction, could be used. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that from outside these glasses will be looked like mirrors, and birds do not distinguish the picture in mirrors, such as reflection of sky and trees, form the real ones.
Secondly, the author suggests that, as a solution, colorful lines and special design may be added to the surface of the glass. In the article, it is said that there will be possibility for people to see though parts of the glass that are not covered with painted patterns. The lecturer, however, asserts that these parts of windows will be concidered by birds as open holes and open space, and, as a results, they will try to fly though them.
Fianlly, another solution said by the author is using magnetic field to guide birds away. The author makes the point than birds have an ability to feel magnatic field of the Earth and can use it during navigation. The professor in the listening passage refutes the reading in the notion that this mechanism is used by bird only during long distance journeys, such as migration, and that in the cities they use other approaches, such as brithness of the sun.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...s as open holes and open space, and, as a results, they will try to fly though them. F...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79253112033 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40508606357 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580912863071 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7621868976 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174507473565 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572366481393 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359209068741 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875443453087 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324765947571 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.