benefits of high taxes on unhealthy products
In this set of materials, the writer strongly postulates the importance of preventing people from smoking and unhealthy food and provides three benefits of employing taxes to such products to endorse it's idea. However, the professor states that the implication of taxes on unhealthy food to avoid them is even more challenging and gainsays each of the reason mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that high taxes on unhealthy products will discourage people to buy these products extensively and as a result, their health will improve. On the other hand, the speaker explains that people will not stop purchasing cigarettes or processed food in spite of high taxes. They will eventually end up by buying cheap and low quality food which will ultimately increase the risk to their health. Moreover, they will have less money to spend on healthy food after paying high taxes.
Next, the professor in the lecture further points on details that no matter what the income is, the person addicted to cigarettes, tobacco and fast food is still going to purchase them to satisfy his needs. In fact, high taxes will be a great burden on people with less wages. So the idea seems to be unfair with low income people. These claims refutes the writer's implication about employing taxes on unhealthy products is fair with the people who do not use such things. Also, the burden of medical cost will be shifted to people who have unhealthy lifestyle.
Ultimately, the article wraps it's arguments by declaring that the money obtained from taxes on cigarettes will increase the budget of government for medical and public welfare significantly. Consequently, it will be beneficial for the whole society. On contrary, the speaker in the lecture refutes the point by showing accuracy of the author that by doing so the government will become solely dependent on the revenue obtained from taxes. Government will not impose laws to ban such unhealthy activities for instance, smoking in public places by means of not loosing the extra income they are getting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-30 | SahilJain | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | bhaskar1325 | 70 | view |
- do you agree or disagree It is better to work as a team or as an individual 70
- MEthods to predict earthquakes 81
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 80
- Model of a painting 70
- Portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun wages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s will be a great burden on people with less wages. So the idea seems to be unfair w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'refute'.
Suggestion: refute
...ir with low income people. These claims refutes the writers implication about employing...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...income people. These claims refutes the writers implication about employing taxes on un...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 560, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...moking in public places by means of not loosing the extra income they are getting.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in fact, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05797101449 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57288790135 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7535941951 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275529497267 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090986068138 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964211964778 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172826474412 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788249723429 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.