Businesses often need to hire new managers or executives to fill vacancies that result from someone leaving the company or from its expansion. They can choose either to promote an employee from within the company or to hire a new employee from the outside. Though the decision to hire externally or internally may pose difficulties to some, bringing in someone from outside the corporation offers many advantages.
Perhaps the most important is that individuals from outside the company bring new ideas and perspectives. Internal employees that have spent years within the company often find it difficult to do things differently from what they’ve been taught. By not being ingrained in the corporate culture, an external hire looks at company policy and procedures with an open mind. This kind of fresh analysis can lead to cheaper, more efficient ways of doing business.
Second, the cost of hiring is significantly reduced. Internal hires are promoted into their new positions and require training on how to perform their new jobs and responsibilities. Hiring externally, on the other hand, permits companies to employ only those individuals who already possess the necessary skills, allowing the company to save not only on training expenses but also on the cost of reduced productivity that results when an employee is in training.
Another important consideration lies in avoiding unnecessary conflicts that may hurt the ability of a company to function well. Managerial and executive positions don’t become available often, so when an opportunity does arise, most employees compete fiercely for the position. If a corporation hires internally, it may lead to feelings of frustration and anger in the employees that weren’t hired, creating a potentially hostile environment that the newly promoted employee will find difficult to manage. If a company hires externally, this can be avoided altogether.
The reading excerpt states that there many advantages when the businesses hiring new managers externally, the author provides three reasons for support. However, the lecture's audio claims that there are a lot of problems with the author theories and he refutes each of them by stating the cause of these merits is not obvious.
To begin with, the article avers that the perhaps the most important is that individuals from outside the company bring new ideas and perspectives, so, this can lead to cheaper, more efficient way of doing business. In contrast, the professor opposes this outlook by saying that the outsider person not always brings a good idea, for instance, a major restaurant who hired for fresh cooker, this worker began to use what he learned to do before such as using chemicals and food contained hormones which, in turn, reflected negatively on the workplace and lead to dramatic decrease in business profits because the did not know what that person learn before. Thus, this idea contradicts what the professor explained.
Second, the passage posits that cost of hiring is significantly reduced. Internal hires are promoted into their new positions and require training on how to perform their new jobs and responsibilities. In contrary, the speaker argues this theory and explains that the external workers will require time to produce a positive interaction and communication with the coworkers which is maybe few weeks to few months, so, they will need about the same time the internal workers need for training. Therefore, this point of view is not credited to what the lecturer discussed.
Third, the excerpt mentions that another important consideration lies in avoiding unnecessary conflicts that may hurt the ability of a company to function well. This cast doubt on what the lecturer states by explaining that it is right hiring from inside will lead to conflicts but bring a manager from outside will lead to more drawbacks because this will make the workers feel that they will not be given any opportunity to vacancy in the future, thus, this will lead to a negative impact on their way of work and, in turn, will affect the company. So, this point of view is definitely wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lectures'' or 'lecture's'?
Suggestion: lectures'; lecture's
...three reasons for support. However, the lectures audio claims that there are a lot of pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 401, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... the coworkers which is maybe few weeks to few months, so, they will need about th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03804347826 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60121209205 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.031582 49.2860985944 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.5 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1726929314 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577106155909 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573093859699 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986892629082 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172619848636 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.