colonization on asteroids merit and demerits
Both lecture and the reading article are dicussing about the idea of colonization on asteroids. The lecturer in the lecture is not convincened by the points mentioned in the text and explain in detail each and every point. However, the reading text provides three crucial reasons that how asteroids would be the best option for colonization.
To begin with, the first issue we encounter is with the effects of lower gravity of asteroids on astrounauts. The professor highlights that it is not a valid reason and has some flaws in it. He said that it is not a practical and have seroius downside. ALso, it comes with some risks like astraunuts loose muscle mass and have decrease bone density due to low gravity. Moreover, long term colonist may have to face health problems. On the hand, the reading covers that because of low gravity landing will be easy, less fuel will be used and more equipments will be taken in spaceship.
Secondly, the another topic for debate is the mining of valuable metals. The speaker points out that this is not the whole picture. When we mine metals in space, it will be more expensive. Furthermore, the target market will not be same as when supply increases demand decreases. While, the reading states that as asteroids are rich in gold and platinum, they will be of graet benefit to bussinesses related to them.
Finally, to wrap the things up the final point of discussion is feasibility to reach the asteroids. The lecturer suggest that it is no doubt correct that asteroids are easy to reach but may be they are not easy to to returun from. To add on, they have unusal patterns. Sometimes some of the orbital paths come close to earth but may travel further away and will be a great challenge to get back to earth. Nevertheless, the writer believes that they periodically come closer and so will be much feasible and and a chaeaper way to get and come back as compare to other planets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...ty to reach the asteroids. The lecturer suggest that it is no doubt correct that astero...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ct that asteroids are easy to reach but may be they are not easy to to returun from. T...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...y to reach but may be they are not easy to to returun from. To add on, they have unus...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n, they have unusal patterns. Sometimes some of the orbital paths come close to earth but m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 504, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ome closer and so will be much feasible and and a chaeaper way to get and come back as ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70796460177 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5273333699 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560471976401 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7371909137 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.061478519455 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200427052013 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238720663305 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0393816391085 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00903747325378 0.0443174109184 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.