Core curriculum
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the core curriculum which are required courses to all students.
The reading passage states that core curriculum are designed to develop student's communication, thinking, and mutual reactions skills. The passage claims that core curriculum provide a great learning experience. However, the professor casts doubts on that by suggesting that some students find core curriculum easy. Thus, they do not benefit from them. Because student's learn nothing from core curriculum, the professor proposed restriction on core curriculum.
The reading passage argues that core curriculum increases students' performances. The professor disagrees by saying that core class sizes are usually big, which makes it difficult for students to score high. For instance, they hardly write comfortably in class due to the crowd.
The passage states that students who are exposed to core curriculum are provided with a broader perspective of life, for they are challenged with a variety of topics such as philosophy, culture religions, world views. The professor counters this idea by pointing at the fact that core curriculum may deviate the students attention on their measure of studies. The professor proposed that students who follow core curriculum find somebody to tell them what is relevant for their measure because not every topic is relevant when people follow core curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ct that core curriculum may deviate the students attention on their measure of studies. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...attention on their measure of studies. The professor proposed that students who fo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70957948539 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550925925926 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5538427706 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56186328307 0.272083759551 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.266150445826 0.0996497079465 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161049951443 0.0662205650399 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380690967424 0.162205337803 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121189556381 0.0443174109184 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.