Discussion about whether dinosaurs are endotherms or not?
From the begining to the end lecturer have strick contrast with the reading passage that dinosaurs are endotherms that keeps body temperature constantly in 37 celcius. Lecturer have strong evidence that keeps her statement.
Firstly, reading passage states that some fossils found in polar region which only endotherms could survive by controlling its body temperature. However, lecturer provides decent explantion by temperature change in era. In dinosaurs era the polar area was warm and when ice age started dinosaurs migrated and some died.
Secondly, as declared in reading leg position allows active physical movement point out the dinosaurs were keep its body temperature. Refuting this point, lecturer argues that those legs under its body are growed due to its gaint size of body. For example, in human life tall peaople have, larger feet.
Finally, reading believes that haversian canals connects bone structure consint of blood vessels helps to grow organism. Fossils illustrating that dinosaurs had haversian canals. Albeit, lecturer disagree with statement that giving specific example. When weather is become warmer growth was increased yet when it cools down growth stopped.
In conclusion, lecturer refutes the statement that early dinosaurs were endotherm by giving sufficient example.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ture constantly in 37 celcius. Lecturer have strong evidence that keeps her statemen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 196.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67857142857 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53527282323 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673469387755 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4594779604 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6153846154 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130716740074 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482285979014 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578723485513 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863875812722 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482209232407 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.07 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.