Formation of team for completing a project
The reading supports the idea of creating group for implementing a certain project and it provides few reasons of support. However, the professor contends that forming group for completing a project is not a good way and he refutes each of the reasons of the article.
First, the article argues that the group has wide variety of knowledge, expertise and skills to perform a certain project, which assists to complete the project within shortest possible time. The professor refutes this point by stating that the reading's claim is problematic and is not realistic. He claims that it takes long time to come consensus among the team members of the group, which results into delay of completing the project. Also he says that it takes time to meet the group members, which wastage of working hours.
Second, the passage claims that the group formation for performing a project helps to find out the creative solution. For instance, group can take risky decisions, which an individual can not take because every one of a group is accountable and this ends into creative solution of a problem. However, the professor contends this argument that there might be some influential group member, who might create pressure to implement his/her idea though the idea is not feasible. He also states that it might resulted into failure of a project.
Finally, the reading claims that this rewarding for all group members. However, the professor argues that there will be free rider in a group. He will get reward for the successful completion of project though s/he had not done anything for the project. Also the professor claims that this would create frustration to the real contributors and s/he would not get his/her actual reward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'within the shortest'.
Suggestion: within the shortest
..., which assists to complete the project within shortest possible time. The professor refutes th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s into delay of completing the project. Also he says that it takes time to meet the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... had not done anything for the project. Also the professor claims that this would cr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52479028282 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496527777778 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5673025183 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289446198305 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108283902147 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106026502784 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183873974234 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337500683189 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.