The reading states that “ Cloud Seeding” is an effective method to convert hail into snow or harmless rain, which would protect the crops from getting destroyed by hails in the US. Thus, the author gives reasons for the support. However, the professor explains that the method of cloud seeding is neither effective nor clear, and thus, she refutes each of the points mentioned in the article.
First, the author posits that according to the laboratory experiments, cloud seeding is effective. Conversely, the professor contends that even though it may be true that the experiment of adding silver iodide to cold water vapour would convert hail to snow, but then it would prevent other forms of precipitation too like rain.This situation will result in drought which would cause damage to the crops due to lack of water.
Second, the reading avers that the cloud seeding was successfully used to control precipitation in urban areas in many Asian countries. This suggests that cloud seeding will also be effective to control hail in the US. The professor rebuts this argument by saying that the research in Asia was conducted in urban areas which is not applicable in US farm lands. She explains that the cities have more pollution due to industries and motor vehicles, which creates favourable conditions for cloud seeding. However, there is no pollution in the rural areas thus, this idea may not work in the unpolluted farm lands in USA.
Finally, the article claims that few local studies on cloud seeding found that the area treated with cloud seeding had reduced hail damage compared to the previous years. Conversely, the professor contends that the claims in the article are not convincing. She points out that although, the damage cause by hail was reduced in the study areas, there were many other areas in north, east and south of that region which also experienced reduced crop damage due to hail. She elaborates that this result was more likely due to the natural variation in the local weather and not because of cloud seeding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...er forms of precipitation too like rain.This situation will result in drought which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, may, second, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01166180758 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4540728655 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498542274052 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7749719785 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.785714286 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1673511239 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572364732518 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492244125879 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107260209887 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277998284024 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.