It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
The desire to have a more intriguing life has permeated every realm of life. Due to the fact myriad of people spend much time engaging in their work, for finding the optimum way for a more enjoyable life, we cannot overlook the significance of our profession. Therefore, there is a unanimous consensus about the huge impact of our job on our daily life, but there is a controversy surrounding the desirable format of our jobs. Many think it is much better to work only in three days, even for a very long time rather than working in a shorter time but for five days, while others disagree. In my vantage point, there are pros and cons to each statement, but overall, the positive effects of working for three days outweigh. In the following paragraphs, I express two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
First and foremost, because modern cities are very crowded, and always congestion traffic exist, we cannot do anything besides our professional works in the days that we designate for work. Nowadays, people are mostly living in the cities that have many populations, and It is likely that we should spend much time for commuting to go and return from our works; hence, we do not have any time to perform other activities like going out with our family members or having a good meal in a good restaurant. As a result, it is wiser to do our professional works in the fewer days and have a longer weekend. For example, after I graduated from my university, I recruited in an engineering company. In the beginning, I, personally, select to work in five days (even we have other options) because I think in this way, I can have more time with my families, especially, every evening. After a while, I found that was a sweet illusion, and I changed my work format. This example embodies that the shorter day format affords people to have a sparer time.
In the second place, I cannot perform multitasking, very well. I prefer to concentrate on one problem each time. Therefore, it has more lucrative aspects to work in more compound days with long hours to be focus on my professional works. Moreover, after work-days, I can easily focus on my spare time and find ways to have a more relishable time. As a case in point, the days that I worked in five days a week, multitude time I made decision to go out with my friends and have fun with them. Because I was engaged with my works issue, simultaneously, most of the time my friends were irritated because of my demeanor. Eventually, they said that they prefer not to going out with me in my work-days. Now, I think to myself, If I had had another work format, they might not have made that decision!
In the final analysis, based on the reason that have been mentioned above and some other lateral aspects, having shorter day work format, not only does help us to be more prosperous in our professions but also it facilitates more enjoyable life for us. If you cast doubts on my points, I will invite you to see my friends; they clear up your doubts, I bet!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1014, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ies that the shorter day format affords people to have a sparer time. In the second p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, as a result, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 75.0 22.412803532 335% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 30.3222958057 244% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 1373.03311258 181% => OK
No of words: 543.0 270.72406181 201% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56906077348 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.04702891845 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62448708649 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 145.348785872 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482504604052 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.0 419.366225166 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 3.25607064018 584% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 1.25165562914 799% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6436724768 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.772727273 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6818181818 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356528297908 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106154304982 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748828779177 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234056569874 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298026170077 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 63.6247240618 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.