This material addresses the question of whether genetically modified trees have more benefits as compared to natural ones. The reading passage suggests that there are some serious advantages to be considered. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that modified trees have some significant problems.
This material addresses the question of whether genetically modified trees have more benefits as compared to natural ones. The reading passage suggests that there are some serious advantages to be considered. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that modified trees have some significant problems.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that genetic modification makes trees are more resistant to environmental challenges. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that insects and climate may kill all genetically modified trees because of their uniform nature. At the same time, infections, climate conditions and other challenges will not result in killing all of the unmodified trees; few of them will survive in any case.
Also, the article posits that modified trees have some positive economic implications, as they grow faster, give more fruits or food. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, she mentions that the seeds of modified trees are more costly, and, according to legislation, farmers have to pay for them every time they plant them.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that modified trees help natural trees to survive, since the increasing demand for firewood and building timber is secured by genetically modified trees. This goes counter to the information in the listening passage, according to which, modified trees are planted in same areas where natural trees grow, and due to their aggressive growth deprive unmodified trees from resources such as sunlight, nutrition, and thus contribute to their elimination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
This material addresses the question of whether genetically modified trees have more be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r challenges will not result in killing all of the unmodified trees; few of them will surv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, thus, while, such as, in any case, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54509803922 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73082001083 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603921568627 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8859523442 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.545454545 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489129111403 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194476476287 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181242732303 0.0662205650399 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328845526564 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.316413238629 0.0443174109184 714% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.