medical record
According to the reading, nowadays, the number of many physicians who are using electronic medical records has been increasing. The author in the reading said that the new method to record medical information has several advantages. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal of the author's argument.
First of all, the author in the reading insists that utilizing novel medical records is conducive to diminish costs by economizing storing and transferring the information. The reading said that the electronic method does not take up any areas and doctors can easily approach the information regardless of their locations and times. However, the professor in the lecture said that even though having electronic devices, most doctors record their patients' medical information by their hands. They also see their medical information from their written things. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that using electronic records aids people to decrease costs owing to the portability of information by the way and its freedom from restriction of space.
Second, the author in the reading contends that doctors can get rid of their errors by electronic mechanics. The reading said that since electronic records have standardizations of forms and are helped by computers, people can remove the possibilities of human error. However, the professor in the lecture said that people still use traditional methods although having electronic devices. After writing, staffs always check and revise their records. This counters the reading passage's claim that electronic devices can help doctors to abate human error on account of its standard form and computers' assistance.
Lastly, the author in the reading argues that doctors can gain more medical information thanks to the electronic methods. The reading said that on the internet, databases store a lot of data, but it is impossible for people to get thousands of people records by paper research. However, the professor in the lecture said that in the U.S., there is a privacy law that inhibits doctors to access patients' information. although they can sometimes be permitted, it is not granted for them to see the information.
This refutes the reading passage's claim that doctors can acquire numerous medical research information by electronic records since there are many data in databases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...es several reasons as a rebuttal of the authors argument. First of all, the author ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...doctors to access patients information. although they can sometimes be permitted, it is ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, lastly, second, so, still, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 373.0 270.72406181 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40750670241 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7617376605 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458445040214 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.926353131 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.055555556 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258970190467 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105024779612 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114332007737 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199842957966 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104847543345 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.