The reading discusses three bad effects of people reading less literature than they used to. the lecture shows why these effects are not so bad or are caused by something other than people choosing not to read so much literature.
The article states that people, especially the ones are reading less literaure like: novels, plays and poems today and they used to, and that this is a adverse change for the culture of the public generally. The author provides three reasons to support this statement. However, the professor diagrees with this statement. She established that literature is not the only form of book that is intellectually stimulating, and she opposes every of the author's reason.
First, the article claims that by reading less literature, the public is missing out on the important benefits. The professor refutes this point, she stated that there are numerous books and forms of entertainment and education that are beneficial to the public apart from literature, some of the books she mentioned were: political and sceince books, that are of high quality and intellectually outstanding.
Second, the article states that diverting the time spent on literature to other forms of entertainment like: television and visiting webpages lowers the level of the culture generally. The professor disagree with this, she explained that people were not wasting their time by choosing to use other forms of entertainment, she noted that the cultutral values are not declining, but rather this new forms of entertainment have been able to adopt better forms of expression that are appealing to contemporary users that literature.
Finally, the article blames readers for the future decline of literatue. The author stated that writing and reading of literature will decline because of the poor standards of present readers. However, the professor opposes this point by stating that some of the likely reasons for the decline is mostly the author's fault. She reveals that modern literatures tends to be difficult, and that earlier readers might not have read these modern literaures like they read literatures in the past if given the opportunity.
And so, this is how the professors lecture contradicts the statement and reasons given in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that people, especially the ones are reading ...
^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...oday and they used to, and that this is a adverse change for the culture of the p...
^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...al to the public apart from literature, some of the books she mentioned were: political and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 252, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ssor opposes this point by stating that some of the likely reasons for the decline is mostl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36956521739 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78995570944 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506211180124 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.8878131913 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158937348549 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585244637832 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539894407103 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891313576241 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212618375698 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.