Reading： Europeans arrived in Australia before the 1606s.
main points:
• Point 1: Europeans have a map of Australi.
• Point 2: A mammal is known to Europeans is very common in Australia.
• Point 3: A string of keys made by Europeans was found somewhere in Australia, which can be dated to about the 1500s according to the surrounding soil.
Listening to lecture (oppose specific points:)
• Point 1: There are many inaccuracies in the maps drawn by Europeans, so they did not arrive, just hearsay.
• Point 2: The animal is known to Europeans is not only found in Australia but also in North America.
• Point 3: The time measurement of European crafts in Australia may be wrong because modern technology has found that measuring the age of the land alone cannot determine the age of crafts.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
Paragraph stating three pivots here which need to be cleared as stated in the audio version of oppose by the lecturer that will discuss below.
First, There was a vogue in presence of Map, a dubious thaought may appear a the listening section of lecture, on paragraph the promt says that the map was authentic but when we liston inside the opposite statement that stats eupeans map was inaccurate and have many flaws in it, on the other hand lecture describe us that there were other people do came before them and might they have the correct map.
Second, The Animal were on both the country north amaria and Australia not just in Australia, As per passage context European have a information about the mammal in Australia was the very common inside australia itself but inside lecture we can directly see that lecturer givind a statement about that animal which was not only present in the australia but also in the north america.
Third, the time measurement is not holding any water in the context of Para as per the lecturer because of the unclearness of technological evidence that proof the record which determins that it is 100% sure, but it is not becuase there is no such thing present on earth that validate the age of european craft that means age of land is not directly proportional to the age of any European craft.
In Conclusion, The reading stated many points including Map Accuracy, Mammals occurance and the age of craft but opposing site have the proof of all the points that says the context in the paragraph needs more clear varification on the nebulous grond of information, On the other hand lecturer said many points that imply on more information needed before the final conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lecturer that will discuss below. First, There was a vogue in presence of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...e of Map, a dubious thaought may appear a the listening section of lecture, on paragr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a, As per passage context European have a information about the mammal in Austral...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, third, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79797979798 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4676712318 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 59.0 21.2450331126 278% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.5256750793 49.2860985944 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 285.0 110.228320801 259% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 59.4 21.698381199 274% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.8 7.06452816374 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270655514078 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117770781704 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844908737388 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117770781704 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844908737388 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.9 13.3589403974 231% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 53.8541721854 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.1 11.0289183223 228% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.45 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 10.7273730684 242% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 25.6 10.498013245 244% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.2008830022 232% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.