Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species' extinctions.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The conclusion of Humans are not guilty foe the extinct given by archaeologist due to the facts of Climate change and Bones not found in the research shows the not fully evaluated thesis which is leading to the dubious state because if bones are also extint then there is the conflict in it- this set up is having so much flaws listed below.
First, Evidence was given as the bones were not found, if there was any environment effect there has to be evidnece of bones of large mammels as we can see in the statement we have found the bones of fishes, for instance, 10,000 BC there were dianosours living int eh earth and a large environment effect climate changed due to collision of a some rock from galaxy but still we can find there evidence of bones, Mamals bones were not found that simply means there has to be misplaced by someone.
Secondly, Simillarieties between large mammals and the fishes is a ambiguous state that presented in the statement- this is just the same as when people used to say earth is flat , squared not in a shape of circle or oval but when astronaut move from earth inner surface to outer space then nthey got the eveidence of circle /oval shape of the earth, Two thing simillarities is not sane writer have to come up with the authentic proof of the mammals bones extint
Third, Quantification required for the conclusion statement given by the writer because if 3000 Mammals are extinct from the Kaliko Islands then people cannot belives that there bones also extinct, or if there is a somewhat possibilities of extinct by climate change then archaeologist must also dive deep in the factor of how much mammals were ther before Human came into Kaliko Island and what are the changes from then till now to understand the climate change effect and the possibilites to proove the conclusion, Say Suppose- Humans were came in to island and they were struggling to for the foos and they must have found mammals ans they use them as food and there bones for building house or there fur as cloths, any thing can be imagined but we need a proof here for all the hypothetical imagination
Ofcourse archaeologist are the brilliant minds in the humans but we still have to prooves our all fact with the related quantified evidence, for everyone who read they must not quentioned on it because 3000 mammals extinct is a great loss to the island every animal is the important in the earth because they are contributing in the natures development and maitaining the cycle of natures, Writer have to come up with the eveidence of bones extinct, before human what wasthe ratio of the mammals extict, if it is happened by climate change then there has to be the bones left in the surface or below the surface as we have found the dinosours bones since 10000 BC.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 24 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 22 2
No. of Sentences: 6 15
No. of Words: 495 350
No. of Characters: 2255 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.717 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.556 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.436 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 82.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.269 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.543 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.252 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...onflict in it- this set up is having so much flaws listed below. First, Evidence wa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...between large mammals and the fishes is a ambiguous state that presented in the s...
^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as when people used to say earth is flat , squared not in a shape of circle or ova...
^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ust also dive deep in the factor of how much mammals were ther before Human came int...
^^^^
Line 4, column 544, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...he conclusion, Say Suppose- Humans were came in to island and they were struggling t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 721, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... building house or there fur as cloths, any thing can be imagined but we need a proof her...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'natures'' or 'nature's'?
Suggestion: natures'; nature's
...th because they are contributing in the natures development and maitaining the cycle of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 495.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61818181818 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47476533221 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442424242424 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 730.8 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 19.7664670659 15% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 165.0 22.8473053892 722% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 718.81816585 57.8364921388 1243% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 762.0 119.503703932 638% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 165.0 23.324526521 707% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 27.6666666667 5.70786347227 485% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157348048272 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921862570198 0.0743258471296 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547927743468 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088115699725 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523688373725 0.0628817314937 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 82.8 14.3799401198 576% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -87.54 48.3550499002 -181% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.1628742515 222% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.5 12.197005988 545% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.7 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.79 8.32208582834 178% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 12.3882235529 218% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 68.0 11.1389221557 610% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 27.0 11.9071856287 227% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.