salvage logging
The passage is about salvage logging after forests fires and severe storms which affect /are affecting/ the noerthwestern part of the US. The author believes that the processing of damaged woods will be economically and biologiucally efficient. Yet the professor hasve an opposite opinion about this. at.
The first supportive point of the author is to provide free space for new trees to grow. It is clear that dead trees will require several years to decompose and will not allow new ones trees to grow rapidly. However, the speaker does not agree with this statement. He claeims that these very dead trees themselves are the main fertilizers of the soil. Thus, it will make much better conditions for new growing trees in the future.
The second argument of the passage has due to with insects. The decaying wood is a good environment for spruche bark beetle insect which can have a bed impact on other living trees. This is why the reomoving of dead wood can resque the rest part of the forest from insects. Nonetheless, the professor does believe that the decaying wood is living space for other good insects and birds as well. For instance it can have good influence on other population of insects which have important role in forests development.
The final reason to support salvage logging associated with economic benefits. Activeevly developing industry require a lot of wood for production and together with this forest fires are diminishing available wood resourcies. Usually collecting of fired wood can treat this situtation. Fired wood is still useful for production and can hire local people for work. On the other hand the professor is explaining that the process of fired woo collection is expenscieve and difficult process. Very often this procsiedure need advanced expeanscive technicques and proffessionals in this job. From this can be inferred that even locals cannot be involved in this works.
In conclusion, it is evident that forest disasters have a bad influence on both economics and ecology. Nevertheless the author thinks that salvage logging can softean the economic problems. Yet the professors support the idea that it is much better to leave forests as they are and do not collect fired wood.
30 minutes without checking
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...r hasve an opposite opinion about this. at. The first supportive point of the aut...
^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is evident that forest disasters have a bad influence on both economics and ec...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...nfluence on both economics and ecology. Nevertheless the author thinks that salvage logging ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 372.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08870967742 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66791696972 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 13.0662251656 184% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9284318045 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.875 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108706958079 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401004830557 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107502994944 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692915555039 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751817265608 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.