smokng cigarettes and high taxes
The article states that paying high taxes in cigarettes and unhealthy food is beneficial for the society and provides three reasons. However, the professor explains that each of the benefits of paying high taxes can be challenge and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that with high taxes people do not going to buy cigarettes and fast food. The professor refutes this point by stating that increasing the taxes on cigarettes will lead smoker to buy cheapest cigarettes. As a result, those are the bad quality and are more harmful because they have sustances that have a high risks. Also, high taxes on no healthy food lead buyers to buy it eventhough is more expensive letting less money to buy healthy food.
Second, the article claims that these kind of taxes are financially fair. However, the professor contends that it is not fair that all people have to pay high taxes. because at the end people with lower income are who pay more than the ones that have a high income.
Third, the reading avers that the government will beneficiated with the high taxes on cigarettes. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the government never will create anything to avoid smoking cigarettes in public areas, he says that is unlikly that they create a ratical measures that avoid this , because they. are beneficiated with the high taxes from the cigarettes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'buy the cheapest'.
Suggestion: buy the cheapest
...taxes on cigarettes will lead smoker to buy cheapest cigarettes. As a result, those are the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tting less money to buy healthy food. Second, the article claims that these ki...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...od. Second, the article claims that these kind of taxes are financially fair. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...that all people have to pay high taxes. because at the end people with lower income are...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that all people have to pay high taxes. because at the end people with lower income are...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'create'.
Suggestion: will never create
...his point by saying that the government never will create anything to avoid smoking cigarettes in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reate a ratical measures that avoid this , because they. are beneficiated with the...
^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...easures that avoid this , because they. are beneficiated with the high taxes from t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, third, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88983050847 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40009109241 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495762711864 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2625929231 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348009408755 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150841510801 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801119722075 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220583233281 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553535459746 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.