Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the given issue, the author states that some people think that human needs to utilize the land for farms, housing, and industries are more important than saving land for endangered animals. I would partially agree with the author since there have been many incidences of humans taking over the natural habitats. However, the efforts of mankind to preserve the natural flora and fauna can't be ignored.
We live in a generation, where population all around the world is rising exponentially. In the woke of this, expanding the natural residential areas to occupy the increasing population is the only solution. But, while doing so, humans tend to forget that due to their expansion, some animals will lose their natural habitat. Also, cutting down huge forests can lead to an increase in pollution and consequently a harmful environment. Humans forget that doing so disrupts the natural life cycle and can prove to be very dangerous for the animals. Along with the residential expansion, humans tend to even acquire natural lands for industry purposes and create a more harmful environment altogether. So, it is true as the author suggests that humans are turning more ignorant about the other species on the planet and are thinking about their own good.
While the above is true for most scenarios, we also have many Sanctuaries and National Parks that are meant to preserve the natural habitat and the endangered animals in particular. Strict laws have been made to prevent animal hunting for commercial purposes. Due to increased advancements in the field of zoology, biology, and biochemistry, humans today are able to preserve the existing species and also the DNAs of the species that are on the verge of extinction. This helps them to study these animals and also carry out experiments that can lead to their hybrid species and preserve the characteristics. All of this is possible due to a lot of people around the world being passionate and interested in saving the natural flora and fauna around the earth. So, as far as the author's claim is considered, humans have not only saved the endangered species but have worked beyond to preserve them.
As I would like to conclude, while the author's claim is true, I think regulatory laws must be undertaken by every country to prevent human interference in the natural habitation and strict rules while expanding in a forest area. This will prevent the endangering of more species and improve life-cycle balance. Also, the advancements in the preservation of these species will help to see a better future and fewer chances of completely losing any type of animal or plant from the earth.
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Summarize the points in the lecture being sure to explain how they address the specific ideas about solar energy described in the reading passage 66
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situations such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey firstborn infant monkeys prod 28
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 68
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...to preserve the natural flora and fauna cant be ignored. We live in a generation,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, while, as to, i think, in particular, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 30.3222958057 195% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1373.03311258 161% => OK
No of words: 441.0 270.72406181 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01587301587 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67131538282 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 145.348785872 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49433106576 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 419.366225166 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4462508418 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.421052632 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 4.33554083885 346% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217285283976 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704855421799 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812812012423 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15018915027 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779559387991 0.0443174109184 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.