: Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage
Both the reading and the lecture are about whether Sinosauropteryx had feathers or not. In this vein, the reading passage, by providing three major reasons, argues that Sinosauropteryx had not feathers. However, the professor refutes each of the author's reasons and states there are some strong evidence and confirming that Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur. she says that the article's reasons are not convincing.
First of all, the text claims that the fine line around the Sinosauropteryx was not functional structures of a living a dinosaur. Actually they formed after the animal died due buried in volcanic ash which its skin may have decomposed and changed to fibers so the lines misread as evidence of feathers. In contrast, the professors reject this idea by saying that scientists did not See any decomposition other animals on that site. scientists found that the animal's structure shows beautiful preserved in ash.
Secondly, the article discusses, Although the structure of remain fine line was real, but scientist they did not know what part of the dinosaur's anatomy the structures were. Therefore the lines surrounding are much more likely to be fossilized remains of frills. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this point by illustrating a different idea. She explains that frills and feathers are different chemically. In other words, frills, and feathers contain different chemical materials. As matter of fact, those lines were a feather.
As a final point, the writer state that if the functions of Sinosauropteryx were feather so it helps animals to fly or regulate their internal temperature. However, the speaker denies this point by saying that some animals had a similar structure to Sinosauropteryx feather structure. In other words, colorful feature structures used for displaying other animals so Sinosauropteryx had features which was used for display.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...nosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur. she says that the articles reasons are not ...
^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientists
...composition other animals on that site. scientists found that the animals structure shows ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...tist they did not know what part of the dinosaurs anatomy the structures were. Therefore ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... dinosaurs anatomy the structures were. Therefore the lines surrounding are much more lik...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...hat if the functions of Sinosauropteryx were feather so it helps animals to fly or r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...f the functions of Sinosauropteryx were feather so it helps animals to fly or regulate ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99487710066 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4852914468 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2352941176 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795981377657 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296659645931 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361141004301 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494324138847 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244846891341 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.