Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made reading passage.
The lecture and the reading are both about possibility that dinosaurs were endotherms. the author of the passage believes that these are several documents that reveals dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer challenges this statement made by the author. She is of the opinion that all of these explanations cannot prove that dinosaurs were endotherms.
First of all, the author suggests that dinosaurs fossils have been found in Polar Regions. It is mentioned that only endotherms animals could be active in such cold environments. This atgument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that at that time the climate of Polar Regions were so much warmer. Furthermore, she mentions that dinosaurs could migrate in the colder period of time.
Secondly, the writer contends that the position of the legs of dinosaurs allowed them to run. The article notes that this strongly shows that dinosaurs were endotherms just like all modern endotherms that their legs are positioned under their body. The lecturer, however, refutes this by asserting that the position of the legs just does not mean that that they were endotherms, but it explains that their legs could support more weight. He elaborates on this by mentioning that dinosaurs could take advantage of their large size in different ways.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the fossils of dinosaurs show that they had structures named Haversian canals. The author establishes these findings demonstrat that dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that fossils of dinosaurs have revealed that they had growth rins. He puts forth the idea that these structures did not allow them to grow rapidly during cold period of time that in one of the characteristics of exotherm animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ibility that dinosaurs were endotherms. the author of the passage believes that the...
^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t dinosaurs could migrate in the colder period of time. Secondly, the writer contends that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...position of the legs just does not mean that that they were endotherms, but it explains t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 401, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... allow them to grow rapidly during cold period of time that in one of the characteristics of e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 12.0772626932 215% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 22.412803532 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64812110724 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6784951659 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1764705882 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0579320947383 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254256041941 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414536955043 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.037766867615 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173480243618 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.