Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made reading passage.
Although the reading text claims that human activities have cuased serious injuries for birds and their natural habitat, the professor refine the text claims by providing three arguements.
First, she explains that expanding cities and urban environments do not harm all birds species neccessarly. In other word, she says that cities probably are harmful for some speciall types of birds, but there are also provide larger and better places for other types of birds such as pegeaons. Hence, in urban area, not only we face the bird's population reduction, but also we observe growing in their population either. Howevevre the author disagree with this claim and believes expandind cities eventualy lead to shrink bird's population.
Second, the professor challenges the writer's idea assuming growth in agriculture activities, would destroy the bird's habitat. She mentions that nowadays, in the US, less and less lands is used in order to produce food. Because, scientists have introduced much more productive crops so as to produce more harvest.
Third, the lecturer accept that traditionally using chemical pesticides would cause death for some birds species, but now individuals are more aware of applying chemical pesticides and their consequences. Moreover, she explains about two key factors which provide using harmful pesticides: first, developing less harmful and chemical pesticides, additionally, growing pesticides resistance crop that do not dangerous for birds genetically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...iall types of birds, but there are also provide larger and better places for other type...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...ce, in urban area, not only we face the birds population reduction, but also we obser...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... Second, the professor challenges the writers idea assuming growth in agriculture act...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...riculture activities, would destroy the birds habitat. She mentions that nowadays, in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ions that nowadays, in the US, less and less lands is used in order to produce food....
^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e introduced much more productive crops so as to produce more harvest. Third, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve crops so as to produce more harvest. Third, the lecturer accept that traditio...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...l pesticides would cause death for some birds species, but now individuals are more a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, moreover, second, so, third, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68303571429 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72470685092 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629464285714 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2178390225 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.3 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0253568604944 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0110819463556 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0140322562625 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0167669116863 0.162205337803 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00445815441524 0.0443174109184 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.