Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and lecture discuss whether aquaculture also know as fish farming should be supported to prevent overfishing and pollution. The former discusses the reasons to adopt fish farming, while the latter diagrees to each to the reasons provided by the passage.
Firstly, the passage asserts that aquaculture can preserve coastal area by keeping the area clean and control pollution. Fish farming areas are built near coastline and requires clean water to work. While the professor contends that fish farming alters the ecosystem in many harmful ways. The land used for industry or farming now used by fish farming can affect habitats on many poeple.
Secondly, the passage states that fish farming can solve unemployment problem in many poor areas. Because, fish farming needs many workers to work harmoniously with a little training. Whereas, the professor mentions that fish farming in fact makes many poeple unemployed. People near the fishing areas depend on fishing as the source of food and sell fishes for income. If fish farming is initiated in that area only some people will be able to help in fish farming while majority of people will remain unemployed.
Lastly, the text asserts that fish farming can help to preserve many of the depleteing speices of fish. If many fish farms are supported then depleting wild spicies of fish can be replaced and prevented from being consumed. This can help fish to regain more species and prevent from overfishing. While, the proferssor mentions that fish farming requires fish to feed. The fishes of farms act as predator and require fishes to survive. This will cause more wild fisj to be extinct.
Thus, due to above three reasons the professor thinks fish farming is not an effective approach to prevent over fishing and pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: ALSO_KNOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'known'?
Suggestion: known
...ecture discuss whether aquaculture also know as fish farming should be supported to ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tline and requires clean water to work. While the professor contends that fish farmin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nemployment problem in many poor areas. Because, fish farming needs many workers to wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rk harmoniously with a little training. Whereas, the professor mentions that fish farmi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rce of food and sell fishes for income. If fish farming is initiated in that area ...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e species and prevent from overfishing. While, the proferssor mentions that fish farm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41781455992 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506756756757 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8026555264 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8888888889 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0357136506216 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0174136959461 0.0996497079465 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317723911708 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0286976004739 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029088146094 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.