Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people, when they go to a new place, they make new friends and easily forget the old ones. However, I believe that staying in touch with old friends is more important than making new friends for the following three reasons.
First of all, being in contact with old friends is necassary because the longer the friendship, the stronger is the bond. Friendship of many years passes through a lot of thicks and thins and it has sustained. So, a person knows thata friend is there to support and help forever. For example, My cousin Priya and her Riya are best friends since kindergarden. I have seen all the phases of their friendship, from fights to caring and sacrificing for each other. Riya knows that she got Priya's back and they are always there for each other irrespective of the situation. Thus, old friends share unbreakable bond.
Secondly, old friends are the one who knows better than one knows themselves and will help you in decision making. For example, During my undergraduate admission, I was confused between two cities and couldn't decide where I should move. At that time I took my childhood friend's help. She helped me by stating all the pros and cons as per my trait and I was able to decide. Thus, an old friend knows all your triats and guides you better.
Lastly, old friends are your best secret keeper. Since, you and your friend know everything about each other even the deadliest sins and must not have told to anyone is the reason for long lasting friendship. For instance, my best friend had passed her enterance test by asking someone else to take the test for her. I am the only person who knows about this sin. My freind said this secret to me as she trusts me. If I would have told this secret to someone than our friendship would have lasted. Therefore, if you want a permanent secret keeper, you should stay in touch with your old friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
..., I was confused between two cities and couldnt decide where I should move. At that tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aid this secret to me as she trusts me. If I would have told this secret to someon...
^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had told'?
Suggestion: had told
...his secret to me as she trusts me. If I would have told this secret to someone than our friends...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...permanent secret keeper, you should stay in touch with your old friends.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59523809524 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32992188662 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.414499014 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5238095238 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289261946504 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093165796543 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941475846987 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194143519173 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807124380023 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 58.1214874552 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.