Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading states that dinosaurs with modern evidences can be categorized as endotherms and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor claims that dinosaurs are not endotherms and refutes each of the point provided by the reading.
First, the reading claims dinosaurs are endotherms showing the evidence that their fossils are found on polar region; non endothermic animals cannot sustain life on cold climate. However professor says that polar region are warmer than today and during colder climate dinosaurs migrate to warmer or hibernate like modern reptile.
Second, the reading posit that physiology of dinosaur and position of leg make dinosaurs similar to endothermic. The professor refutes this point by saying dinosaurs has nothing to do with position of leg. They are evolved to sustain or withstand their massive weight they have.
Third, the reading says that bone structure, presence of Haversian canal strength the idea dinosaurs being endothermic. The professor opposes this point by explaining that along with Haversian structure dinosaurs possess denseness pattern in bone due to periodic growth which is common on replies. Endothermic shows regular growth which is absent in dinosaurs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ls cannot sustain life on cold climate. However professor says that polar region are wa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60752688172 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59046630292 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5207942347 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113731830193 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510540499607 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319165570235 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749127804043 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334075030397 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.