Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and the lecturer are both about the cause of Little Ice Age. While the author believes that several reasons are responsible to cause Little Ice Age, the lecturer believes that the reasons which are elaborated in the reading are out of date and he casts doubt on the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author states that disrupt the Gulf Stream is one of the reasons that caused the Little Ice Age. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that the arrival of a large amount of cold freshwater into the Gulf Stream affects the climate of the European countries and North America not all the parts of the Earth's climate.
Secondly, the author claims that another reason that has caused Little Ice Age is volcanic eruption. Again this claim is rebutted by the lecturer. He states that it is conspicuous that the volcanic eruptions put enough dust into the atmosphere but the volcanic eruptions that took place during that moment were not strong enough to cool the weather because if they were strong enough they may also cause colorful sunset but this phenomenon was not reported in that time.
Finally, the author mentions that the decline of human populations has decreased the temperature of weather. This idea is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that there was not a sufficient time for trees to grow and absorb a large amount of carbon dioxide to make earth cooler. Moreover, he states that the decreased population of human was not a long-term and the human population was increased and started to cut down trees like past moments; Thus, it is not an acceptable reason to cause Little Ice Age.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81494661922 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35734974235 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483985765125 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.8765629504 49.2860985944 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0501355776067 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0178107759992 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358937846573 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0345033706915 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459356351601 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.