Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The article states that rare and important fossils are now being sold to private ownership for millions of dollars and believed to have unfortunate development to both scientists and general public, and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor disagrees by saying that the selling of the fossils to private individuals have more advantages than disadvantages, she also states that the opinion of the author is greatly exaggerated, and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the article claims that public suffers because fossils that should be donated to museums where everyone can see them are sold to private collectors who don’t allow public access. The professor disagrees by saying that public will have more exposure, because of the commercialization, public will get access thus they can buy fossils and be displayed in public.
Second, the article states that scientists are likely to lose access to some of the mot important fossils and they’ll miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. The professor opposes by saying that the author’s reason is not realistic because before the fossil are ready to be sold it has to be scientifically identified and the person who does this are scientist, and she also states that there is no way that scientists will miss out important information since they are the ones who’ll perform the examination and tests the fossils before it’s available to the market.
Third, the article posits that commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they unearth. However the professor refutes by saying that damage to fossils is minimal and that there are only small number of organizations that locates fossils. She also states that because of the private buyers more fossils are being discovered and that is the most important thing compared to just stopping the access of private buyers to fossils thus there will be less fossil discoveries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nate development to both scientists and general public, and provides three reasons of support....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 73, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...scientists are likely to lose access to some of the mot important fossils and they'll ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sociated with the fossils they unearth. However the professor refutes by saying that da...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40378548896 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82420197382 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492113564669 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0580036637 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.333333333 110.228320801 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2222222222 21.698381199 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0566502050742 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274600006036 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190565903269 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038477197416 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157835161772 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.3589403974 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 53.8541721854 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.