Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage
The discussion is about the 150 million year old mammal R Robustus. As its fossil fuel contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. The Professor in the lectures tells that the R Robustus was the predator not a scavenger as written in text.
Firstly, she argues and proofs her point by telling the fact that size will not be an issue as predator approximately twice the size of its prey can hunt easily. Similarly, the R Robustus though having a smaller size can hunt baby dinosaur.
Secondly, she argues that lesser length of the legs and their position will not slow down the hunting speed of R Robustus. She proves this point by giving an example of a species called as devil, who can achieve good speed while having smaller legs.
Thirdly, she argues that the teeth signs of R Robustus was not found on dinosaur because, this mammal does not have much sharp back teeth, they just hunt by powerful front jaws.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...150 million year old mammal R Robustus. As its fossil fuel contained the remains o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 1373.03311258 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 163.0 270.72406181 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66257668712 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38688942888 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 145.348785872 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 419.366225166 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7941280995 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525862853312 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197760029023 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290064404025 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0305602738506 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215561876936 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 53.8541721854 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 63.6247240618 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.