tidal power- integrated task
The given set of materials is about the tidal energy, which is the renewable source of electricity which can be generated trapping the sea tides into a dam and barrage then rotating the turbines when the water discharge out. The reading passage decribes how electricity can be generated while the lecturer casts doubts by pointing out its disadvantages on local economy, environment and habitat.
Firstly, the lecturer opposes that tidal power can never do more than just a fraction of energy demand although it can contribute in the small region.
Secondly, the lecturer posists that with the use of sea water the local wildlife could be destroyed. As the sea water has high salinity, the mixing of sea water with estacuary could affect the habitat for fish and birds. Similarly, the migratory fish that needs to migrate from fresh water to sea will be hampered due to barrage. Although some provisions could be build but it will make the design more expensive.
Lastly, the lecturer casts doubts of its implication on local economy. The fishing boats will be suffered as they no longer can navigate. Even, the economy of the local people will be reduced.
Thus, the lecturer effectively casts doubts on the use of tidal energy as alternative source of generating electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e habitat for fish and birds. Similarly, the migratory fish that needs to migrate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05633802817 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60725322936 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2370181226 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9090909091 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0618292693722 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237035753343 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423623317085 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490896042941 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501137824648 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.