TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing
The reading says professors' appearing TV has positive effects on professors, universities, and general publics. However, the professor claims in the lecture that it's not beneficial for professors to appear on TV programs.
First of all, the passage states that by appearing on television professors can be recognized and regarded as authorities in their academic field by a wider audience than they have on campus. The professor refutes this point by stating that when professors appear on TV, they are regarded as an entertainer, rather than those who are engaged in education. He also claims that they are less likely to be invited to conference and get money for their laboratory and research.
Second, the reading says that universities professors belong to can also benefit from their appearing on TV. It says universities can get positive publicity and people will think more highly of them, and thus this leads to more donations and applications from competent students. On the contrary, the professor says appearing on TV has negative impact on universities and students because they waste their time by appearing TV and preparing for that. He says they should spend such time on their research, meeting their students, and university businesses.
Third, the passage states that by appearing on TV professors can provide general public with the precious chances to contact with university professors and to get a taste of real expertise and insight from them. However, the professor's idea contradicts to this. He says general public don't expect serious matters to TV programs, and what public programs want is not a professional materials but an academic title.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... appearing on TV professors can provide general public with the precious chances to contact wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ise and insight from them. However, the professors idea contradicts to this. He says gener...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ssors idea contradicts to this. He says general public dont expect serious matters to TV progr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...radicts to this. He says general public dont expect serious matters to TV programs, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'material'?
Suggestion: material
...lic programs want is not a professional materials but an academic title.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, thus, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2723880597 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85861567193 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6853490569 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.