TPO 13
The speaker completely refutes the lecture. The speaker uses three points to indicate that fossil collectors have provided many benefits for the public, in opposition to the reading passage claims.
First, although private collectors might not allow the public to view important fossils, the collectors play an important role regarding the cost of fossils. According to the lecturer, when collectors discover new fossils, many people would like to buy these valuable discoveries. This would, in turn, decrease the cost of the fossil and make it easier for educational institutions, which could not afford the high priced fossils in the past, to collect these fossils.
Second, even though fossils buyers are the ones who own the fossils, this does not mean that scientists have no access to important fossils. This is because when new fossils are discovered, they go through an examination process, which is done by scientists. Therefore, scientists will have the chance to access important fossils and discover new life forms.
Finally, it is true that commercial fossil collectors have no experience with how to unearth valuable fossils and might destroy them, but they are the only group of people that could afford and do this job. This is due to the fact that scientists do not have the opportunity to go and discover new fossils. The speaker says that universities and other institutions do not give scientists funds to do this.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, therefore, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22317596567 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67802905122 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532188841202 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.821576632 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.636363636 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435815530125 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161479997362 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090748202457 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262529737329 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515165599425 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.