TPO 14
The lecture mainly contradics the author's arguments starting that the salvage logging, after natural disasters, benefits society. The professor doesn't believe that the damaged wood removal would profit the forest, or favour the economy.
The reading states that the damaged wood would take several years to decompose, meanwhile new trees can not grow. The professor, however, assesses this point by stating that decompositing profits the soil, and is not as harmful for new trees' growing procedure as teh passage indicates. The professor provides an explanation about the forest with lacks of materials for new trees as the result of rapid removal; this plainly shows that the damaged trees can actually benefit thr forest.
According to the article, dead trees are new habitant of harmful insects. In contract the professor says that harmful insects are not the only new inhabitants of dead trees; in fact, many birds and other useful insects live there, as well. She cocedes that bark beetles_a harmful insect_lives in damaged trees, but this specea used to live in other forest for 100 years without any problem.
The author wraps his argument positioning that salvage loggig helps the economy by providing new jobs. The professor says that this claim is questionable; this is because the dead trees are transported by expensive vehicles, such as hellicopters, which can not be maintained easily.
The professor claims that most of the new jobs are temporary, and outsiders are take the job when compared to locals.
To sum up, both the professor and the author hold conflicting ideas about salvage lodgging. They will have a hard time finding common ground about the issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...asters, benefits society. The professor doesnt believe that the damaged wood removal w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...it the forest, or favour the economy. The reading states that the damaged wood wo...
^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pose, meanwhile new trees can not grow. The professor, however, assesses this point...
^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing procedure as teh passage indicates. The professor provides an explanation about...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., which can not be maintained easily. The professor claims that most of the new j...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, so, well, while, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22878228782 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5330645271 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3949437342 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36116569521 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119503294603 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636521295748 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155693307308 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841251196451 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.