TPO 15-1
Although the author claims three hypotheses to support the fact that new rules and guidelines enacted for archaeological process in Britain in twentieth century and study of old artifacts has made a number of problems and limitations, the professor finds all points dubious and asserts some reasons to refute them all.
The first point to be mentioned is that some construction in the cities and towns has made some artifacts lost. However, the lecturer finds them completely wrong and states that before any construction take place, the builders and government examine the place and carve the ground to see if any artifacts have left.
Furthermore the reading material claims that financial aids are not adequate for doing research and examining the places around sites. In contrast, the speaker asserts that companies how are in charge of construction pay for all expenses including before and after excavation and the expenses of preserving the artifacts finding there.
Eventually, the passage contends that archaeological researcher not only are not satisfied from their income but also they pursue other careers since this is not a well-paid job. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt this idea and says the construction companies pay all the money for all stages and they also hire professional archaeological researchers. So this job has been one of the most important jobs in Britain.
Consequently, the reading material claims some reasons for the fact that the guidelines are not practical and have lots of limitations. Countering that the professor refutes them all since construction companies do all examination and excavations before and after construction, pay for expenses of research and process and make plenty of job opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Although the author claims three hypothe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...d to see if any artifacts have left. Furthermore the reading material claims that financ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...preserving the artifacts finding there. Eventually, the passage contends that ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37769784173 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94052152503 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2378290707 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.048272542365 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228646946345 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0159243519093 0.0662205650399 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.027567700484 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183389162945 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.