TPO 17 Integrated
The author believes that growth in human population, and as a result growth in agriculture, has lead to a decline in birds pupolations. The lecturer, however, has the opposite point of view. She explains why the author is not right about his points.
First, the author states that humans' population growth has converted birds' habitats to living and working areas, therefore, their population has decreased dramatically. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that converting some habitats to cities has provided opportunities for specific kinds of birds, such as seagulls and hawks to thrive.
Second, the author suggests that conversion of some other natural habitats of birds in rural areas to farms, has also lead to a decrease in bird populations in those areas. On the otherhand, the lecturer contends that specifically in the United States, less number of lands are being used for agricultural use every year, providing that new crops, which are being cultivated, are more productive than before.
Finally, the author asserts that increased use of pesticides, which is the result of increased agriculture, harms birds either when they drink contaminated water as well as when they eat poisoned insects, in such a way that they either die or they cannot reproduce. Conversely, the lecturer states that not only new pesticides have been developed that are less toxic, but also new crops are being developed that are more resilient to pests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...oints. First, the author states that humans population growth has converted birds h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...birds in rural areas to farms, has also lead to a decrease in bird populations in th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24034334764 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75963329074 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570815450644 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1731734836 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2222222222 7.06452816374 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324671593693 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113451390285 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803921453447 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180419741862 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418387096452 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.