TPO 18- Torreya Extinction
The lecture and the passage discuss the diclination of the Torrerya tress. Although the passage claims that this tree could be survived from extinction by three possible solutions, the speaker refutes these ideas through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that by restablishing the Torreya in its original location which has microclimate they can prevent the tree from extinction. The speaker, in contrast, rejects thic by claiming that the microclimate strongly affected by climate of the larger region. As the global climate of the region has been changing, the microclimate get dryer than before.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that they can transfer Torreya to and compeletly different location where it can grow reliably, the speaker argues that it is not a good idea since it has been done before fore black tree which was not a successful eperience. the speaker mentions that those back trees grow quickly and they killed another plants. Therefore, moving Torreya would have unpredictable consequences for environment.
Finally, although the passage says that Torreya can be prevented in research centers and their environment can be controled, the professor disagress by mentioning that as the population of Torreya is reletively large, they can kept them in research center due to the reason that this center has not enough capacity and does not capable of preventing this trees from diseases.
Through these reasons the passage ideas' are not beneficial to prevent the Torreya from extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e which was not a successful eperience. the speaker mentions that those back trees ...
^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'keep'
Suggestion: keep
...f Torreya is reletively large, they can kept them in research center due to the reas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37848605578 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74361154811 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545816733068 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.3504636979 49.2860985944 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30128813707 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115962698181 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791666925723 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166859506743 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393861491365 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.