tpo-31
In the reading, the author claims that the idea that Sinosauropeteryx was a feathered dinosaur only based on a fossil skeletone and the fine lines surrounding it sounds unconvincing and points out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all reasons questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that fine lines may be corresponded to the decomposed skin fibers of the dinosaur that were misunderstood as traces of feathers. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that there is no evidence of any decomposition of skins of ther animals found in the same site. Indeed, due to the condition of volcanic ash substances such as animals' skin have been beautifully preserved.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the fine lines surrounding the fossil skeleton are probably remains of fossilized frills. That being said, the lecturer disputes this idea by clarifying the fact that frills and feather are chemically different. Owing to the fact that feather has batocareto but fill is bereft of this substance and also the examinations show the existence of batocareto in the fine lines, these lines must have been remains of feathers than traces of frills.
Finally, the author draws attention to the location of the fine lines were mostly located along the backbone and the tail of the dinosaur and its useless for flying and regulating internal temperature as the last point in supporting the claim. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that feathers may have other functions other than flying. For example, picka has colorful feathers on its tail in order to attract opposite gender. This function is called display function and according to a study which showed this dinosaur has orange and white feathers, it probably benefited from the display function of its feather.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16828478964 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78179012907 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7311217008 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.083333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391248112537 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131255777798 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790024733528 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222545378956 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129636259258 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.