TPO 36- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decade

Essay topics: TPO 36- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decade

mghcivil's picture

Cloud seeding is a method which make farmers able to control hail-caused damages. Hail is a kind of precipitation which hits the ground harmfully and reduces the profits. There are several objections about that cloud seeding could be effective:
According to the passage, laboratory experiments have shown good results and, they suggest that cloud seeding would work. In the experiments, operators added silver iodide to water paper which leads to light snow forming. But, in the real life, iodide could prevent all kinds of precipitations including snow, rain and hail! So, the crops would be damaged by an inadvertently drought.
There are some successful experiencs from Asia that testify the effetiveness of this method. Cloud seeding was used to reduce hail damages in urban areas and, some possitive results were observed. At the U.S.A, the crucial problem is protecting farmlands from hail damages, not urban regoins. In the cities which have polluted air, silver iodide, as the agent of the cloud seeding interact with other elements; Those kinds of reactions would help the process. In contrast, at the farmlands with a clear air, it does not work as well as Asian cities.
Local studies shows reduction in the hail damage at the target areas. These results are not conveneince because, reduction has been observed at many neighboring areas which had not received any silver iodide; This issue implies that the happened reduction is a aggregate reduction that consist of other natural variations. So, the results are not just due to cloud seeding.

Essay Categories: 
Votes: 
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
1 day 20 hours ago Shayooooon 80 Read full essay
4 weeks 1 day ago dorsagh 3 Read full essay
4 weeks 1 day ago dorsagh 3 Read full essay
1 month 1 week ago rohitbibra 85 Read full essay
1 month 1 week ago Rasna James 68 Read full essay
2 months 3 weeks ago Frequency 73 Read full essay
3 months 1 week ago m3.nadimi 83 Read full essay
3 months 1 week ago m3.nadimi 80 Read full essay
3 months 1 week ago m3.nadimi 3 Read full essay
3 months 2 weeks ago Parisa.rnj 73 Read full essay

Pages

More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('inadvertently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drought') instead of another adjective.
...hail! So, the crops would be damaged by an inadvertently drought. There are some successful experiencs ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...itive results were observed. At the U.S.A, the crucial problem is protecting farm...
^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amage at the target areas. These results are not conveneince because, reduction h...
^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... implies that the happened reduction is a aggregate reduction that consist of oth...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, in contrast, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60265432277 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7941058582 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161163578974 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061142609939 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346647245667 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967380900548 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309054833695 0.0443174109184 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages