Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and
I am absolutely disagreed. Thanks to such technologies human's brains have developed and, a new era of the history has been started. Moreover, fast working is a crucial issue which should be obeyd by all people which owe to the internet based facilities and cell phones. There are some reasons to support my opinion as follows:
Breakground technologies like smart phones, fast computers etc. make the life more complex than the past. One of the important things that demands serious changes, to be adapted to the new world, is teaching method. The old teaching methods not only would not work, but also could be too destructive as some academic researches have testifyed it. For instance, whatching scientific movies in the classroom were impossible, whereas, it is a common teaching strategy now which help the students learn effectively; On the better word, people learn better via listening and whatching and examplifying than just listening and whatching. The students are able to perceive the subjects with remembering paradigms of them in the real world. The role of multi media productions in the efficiency of learning is indispensable.
Social networking and web sites are so useful to raise the intelligence. A students improves his or her creative thinking by exploring through the internet. According to my experiences, students who are a normal users of the social networks, are more curious to discover new things and, are more eager to broaden their horizons. So, using the internet based technologies would increase the capacity of accepting new things from the teacher. By the way, in this world, those kinds of facilities could not be omited easily and we have to take advantages of them.
Of course, there are some bad consequences for people who are using them. They are harmful if one use them lavishly and, in contrast, they are so useful if parents and authorities entrench the using culture.But, the benefits of these kinds of inventions are more than their bad aspects.
All in all, I am astrongly disagreed with the statement because, when we are to comprise between two things, we should consider both of the good and bad consequences. Were it not for the internet, the life would not be so easy which is now. Humankind should learn how to use the social networks, web sites etc. correctly to avoid destroying the mentalities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ively; On the better word, people learn better via listening and whatching and exampli...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: A student; Students
...re so useful to raise the intelligence. A students improves his or her creative thinking b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'improve'.
Suggestion: improve
...l to raise the intelligence. A students improves his or her creative thinking by explori...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'user'?
Suggestion: user
... experiences, students who are a normal users of the social networks, are more curiou...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... authorities entrench the using culture.But, the benefits of these kinds of inventi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, in contrast, of course, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03069053708 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80753420008 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554987212276 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6437803226 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118938796141 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359404941916 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500678967834 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652483624914 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274986338507 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.