TPO-42
The reading discusses the danger of glasses which are used in the modern architecture for wild birds and is considered three solutions for it. However, the speaker explains that these solutions are not effective and refutes each author's solutions.
First, the reading avers that the regular glass should be replaced by one-way glass which is transparent in one direction. However, the speaker opposes this point by stating that this kind of glass can be like a mirror and it is as bad as regular glass. The on-way glass reflects the sky and tree, so it is dangerous and perilous for birds because they imagine the glass as a sky and fly through it.
Second, the reading asserts that painting colorful lines on regular glass is other solution which protect birds from damages. The lecturer contends that by painting some small parts of glass the people who are inside can see out but the birds consider those unpainted parts as an opened hole so they move directly through it. Therefore, the unpainted areas should be small which it makes the inside of the building dark and inconvenient for people.
Third, the reading claims that it is better to equip the building with artificial magnetic field. However, the speaker refutes this point by saying that the birds just use the magnetic signals when they want to travel long distance and when they migrate from cold country to warmer before winter. For short trip such as moving from one side of the city to another they find their way by using their eyes and the brightness of light which can be more helpful for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e city to another they find their way by using their eyes and the brightness of l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78308823529 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26099952156 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540441176471 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9359508669 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.272727273 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486240036553 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181136288611 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089080542597 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284334710395 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788890503811 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.