According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that the silver coins, Found in the state of Maine in the United States, could not be brought by European explores known as Norse owing to several highlighted reasons. On the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this justification and repudiate each of the author's specific point by providing several counter-arguments that are as follows:
First of all, the reading holds the view that the distance between the Native American site and Norse inhabitants is more than 1000 kilometers. So, the coins do not have a specific relationship with them. However, the lecturer finds this reason unconvincing and asserts that the discovery of other objects, not only the coins, have been reported. In addition, the Native Americans were more interested in traveling long distances and obtain numerous objects. As a result, they could reach to these regions and bring the silver coins.
Secondly, although the author points out that there is not any document related to the observation of other coins in the Canadian sites, the lecturer explains that it is not necessary to discover other coins. Moreover, the European explorers were not habitual dwellers in that area and they came back to Europe after a while. Therefore, this can lead us to this claim that they brought the silver coins with and took them all back with them.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author says that the silver coins were useless to Americans and did not consider them as money. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that Native North Americans were attracted by the coins' beauty and used them in their jewelry industry. Furthermore, Americans became more interested and trade these coins with Europeans. All in all, based on the reasons in the listening, the claims in the text seem to be implausible
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that the silver coins, Found...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'coins'' or 'coin's'?
Suggestion: coins'; coin's
...e North Americans were attracted by the coins beauty and used them in their jewelry i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6145449128 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522012578616 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6632493108 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363310934894 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121421489907 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589037501987 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208018588988 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743524180814 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.