TPO 45-integrated

Essay topics:

TPO 45-integrated

The passage and lecture are both about the presence of bees dated 200 million years ago. The passage disagrees with this term by illustrating some of their arguments while the lecturer agrees with the existence of bees by giving the reasons opposing the reading's points.

First of all, The passage posits the point that the preserved fossil of the actual bee was only 100 million years. and there was no discovery of the bee fossil which aged 200 million years. while the lecturer opposes by saying that at that time the tree rarely produced a resin which can preserve the bees bodies.so, it doesn't mean that there were no bees in 200 million years ago.

Secondly, The passage gives another point that flowering plants which are the bees' feed were extinct 125 million years ago before the appearance of bees. it was impossible for the presence of the bee at that time. But the lecturer disagrees with this point by stating that bees in the past not only relied on the flowers but they had a relationship with non-flowering plants like pine and fern before the evolution of flowering plants. After this change, these bees also adapted their relationship to the flowers like today's bees.

Finally, the passage argues that the evidence which is the discovered fossil of bee's chamber lacks some details like its caps of the nest. So it is believed to have been made by other insects. but the lecturer refutes this point by analyzing the nest chamber by special water substance. and its outcome shows that 200 million-year-bees use the same kind of as a modern bee.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... actual bee was only 100 million years. and there was no discovery of the bee fossi...
^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ee fossil which aged 200 million years. while the lecturer opposes by saying that at ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ich can preserve the bees bodies.so, it doesnt mean that there were no bees in 200 mi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esnt mean that there were no bees in 200 million years ago. Secondly, The pass...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ears ago before the appearance of bees. it was impossible for the presence of the ...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ved to have been made by other insects. but the lecturer refutes this point by anal...
^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...est chamber by special water substance. and its outcome shows that 200 million-year...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79335793358 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39998252559 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512915129151 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4788403707 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741895954185 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345663313563 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228213274154 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505095512628 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115306564311 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.