TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task
Some skeptics doubt that the ancient fossil structures which found inside 200-miliion-year-old fossilized trees are created by bees.They support their view with three arguments, while the professor in the listening claims that all three statements are not convincing.
Firstly, the skeptics argue that there are no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date to 200 million years ago. On the contrary, professor refutes the skeptics' argument, saying that no fossil remains doesn't mean bees didn't exist that time. She claims that bees may couldn't be preserved due to the absence of tree resin, a sticky liquid, which served as a preservative for bees.
Secondly, professor admits that it is true that bees have dependent biological relationship with flowering plants. However, bees may feed on other non-flowering plants such as pin trees on 200 million years ago. Only when flowering plant started to appeared on 125 million years ago, then bees gradually adapted to feed on the flowering plants.
Thirdly, the skeptics state that fossil structures found in Arizona lack some of the finer details of bee's nest. On the other hand, professor argues that the chemical material found in the old structures are the same as researches found in the modern bee's nest, proving that the old structures are mode by bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some skeptics doubt that the ancient fos...
^^
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...ld fossilized trees are created by bees.They support their view with three arguments...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...three statements are not convincing. Firstly, the skeptics argue that there a...
^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skeptics'' or 'skeptic's'?
Suggestion: skeptics'; skeptic's
... On the contrary, professor refutes the skeptics argument, saying that no fossil remains...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...argument, saying that no fossil remains doesnt mean bees didnt exist that time. She cl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...that no fossil remains doesnt mean bees didnt exist that time. She claims that bees m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ist that time. She claims that bees may couldnt be preserved due to the absence of tree...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h served as a preservative for bees. Secondly, professor admits that it is tr...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to feed on the flowering plants. Thirdly, the skeptics state that fossil ...
^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...fossil structures found in Arizona lack some of the finer details of bees nest. On the othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, such as, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66351408298 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3971878502 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1111111111 7.06452816374 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0462050917475 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221313724687 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0155137782932 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0305490406674 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145610596594 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.