Tpo 46
In term of whether electronic medical records have more advantages over traditional paper-based records, the article and the lecture contradict each other. The author in the reading states several benefits of electronic databases record, however, the professor in the lecture rebut each reason which state by author and claims that these reasons are uncertain.
Firstly, the author claims that medical electronic records reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring data. Although the paper records need huge storage space, the electronic data do not need any space. In contrast, the professor refutes this claims and asserts that electronic records do not decline costs genuinely because these kinds of data need back up records and other instruments to protect the records, therefore, electronic data records do not cut costs actually.
Secondly, the article asserts that electronic medical records decrease the chances of errors dramatically. on the contrary, the speaker cast doubt on this reason and contend that electronic records do not eliminate errors because many doctors still use of paper for examination and their opinion. Thus, their staffs transfer these data to the computer later consequently, employers possibly have some mistakes in transferring data.
Finally, the reading contends that electronic database help to search and research easily. The lecturer refutes this claims and professes that it is difficult to get access to these records yet because there are strict privacy laws in the united state about patients information. Hence, nobody can reach these records and these records do not help to search for any information. Moreover, there is a very strict complicated procedure to get permission to use this information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ase the chances of errors dramatically. on the contrary, the speaker cast doubt on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68291347072 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2716930514 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06452816374 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506830981424 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203341150167 0.0996497079465 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104017356959 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313327427124 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789526448222 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.