Tpo 48
In term of whether proposed methods to solve the problem of declining frog population are beneficial or not the author and the lecturer contradict each other. The author in the article states several methods which help to protect frogs from extinction, on the other hand, the professor in the lecture refutes each method and states that none of these methods are practical solutions for this problem.
Firstly, the author states that frogs harmed by pesticides which enter to frogs body and make severe problems. the authorities should enact some regulations to prohibit these chemical substance uses, in contrast, the professor rebuts this claims and states that reducing the pesticides are not economic solution because due to this action crops decrease dramatically and farmers should use others materials Secondly, the article asserts that fungus is the main reason in frog population which lead to some infection on frogs. Therefore, we scientist should discover some ways such as antifungal medication to prevent this infection. On the contrary, the speaker disclaims this concept and contends that frogs treatment with antifungal are very difficult because these treatments should be used in the large-scale and each frog. Consequently, this action is very complicated and expensive.
Finally, the reading asserts that the frog population decrease owing to human activity and change frogs natural habitats such as wetland and marsh. However, the professor confesses that protecting the marshland and wetland is a good idea but, these habitats threatened by global warming. Thus, protecting these land cannot prevent from harm is very arduous if occur of global warming.
in the nutshell, the professor in the lecture gainsay all methods which suggested by the author in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'frog'.
Suggestion: frog
...ogs harmed by pesticides which enter to frogs body and make severe problems. the auth...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...to frogs body and make severe problems. the authorities should enact some regulatio...
^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professor rebuts this claims and states that reducing the pesticides are not eco...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ry arduous if occur of global warming. in the nutshell, the professor in the lect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42652329749 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6336892198 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541218637993 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.0506837808 49.2860985944 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.636363636 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8181818182 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352030818674 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140967981795 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100924378598 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185027306633 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990591165289 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.