TPO 50
The reading claims that from the beginning of time, sending humans to Mars would require solving a wide variety of problems. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas questionable and presents some evidence to refute them all.
The author argues the first problem is that astronauts need food, water, and oxygen to travel to space but the cargo capacity of space vehicles is too limited to put on board them required by a crew for a period of two years. It is impossible for astronauts to travel to space without them. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that astronauts can use Hydroponics as a technique for producing food and oxygen and they should be cultivated food crops. Also, hydroponics could release some drinking water and oxygen.
Furthermore, the reading passage may hold the view that astronauts would be in the zero-gravity on Mars mission so, it can have negative effects on the human body and it would be impossible for humans to make the trip without experiencing grave medical problems. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that astronauts have learned to use several exercises to conflict decreasing muscle mass.although they can use calcium pills to have strong bones for carrying strong muscles.
Finally, the reading asserts that astronauts would be exposed to dangerous levels of space radiation which emitted by the sun. Although, constructing a shield that would protect the whole spaceship from space radiation is impossible because of its too much weight. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the sun occasionally emitted that dangerous radiation also shield is small enough and have a few weight, so astronauts can go to that little shield when the radiation is high and they can come back to spaceship when the radiation is not dangerous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 426, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun weight seems to be countable; consider using: 'few weights'.
Suggestion: few weights
... also shield is small enough and have a few weight, so astronauts can go to that little sh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07973421927 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70690122983 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541528239203 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3304084795 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.