Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past.
It is widely accepted that from the beginning of time people have been faced with lots of problems and they always wanted to solve them. Some people may hold the view that today’s people are more willing to help each other.someother, nonetheless, take an opposite point and believe that people in the past had more penchant to help other people. There is a controversial question which is raised in this area" what is the difference between helping in nowadays and past?" personally, I am a favor of people nowadays are more willing to help each other. In the next two paragraphs, I will aptly delve into my reasons and I will cogently substantiate this perspective.
The first aspect to point out is that people today have more opportunity to take a job so they have more money and power to help people. In my own experience, last year when I got a job with lots of salaries the first point that comes to my mind was helping to other people with my extra money. The noteworthy statistics revealed by research conducted in Tehran University show that more than 80% people who have more money want to help other people. As an inviolable rule, the more money they give, the more people who want to help. Also, people, today face with lots of issues such as air pollution and earthquakes and so many wars so they have to help each other more than the past.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating my stance is that people based on the psychology researchers when faced with poor people they always want to help them but this reaction is much more than the past because people in those days had not enough information about other people who were far from where they lived. If one weighs the merits and demerits of the above statement, one soon realizes that because of development of technology people today have more information about poor people so they can easily help them much more than past. People in past neither had known poor people nor had the advice to help them from such that far ways. Based on the results drawn from an exhaustive survey conducted by the Amirkabir University nowadays development of technology could prevent lots of obstacles on helping people in far distances.
To recapitulate the above reasons why today people are more willing to help other people than in the past, not only today they have more money and power to help them, but also today development of technology facilitate the helping process; actually, there are other reasons and examples elaborating on this idea which are not mentioned above due to the dearth of time. I highly recommend that people today should help other people more and more because there are innumerable people all over the world who really needs wealthy people's help.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
... what is the difference between helping in nowadays and past?' personally, I am a favo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to help each other more than the past. Another equally noteworthy point in corr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, really, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79454926625 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51517289577 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431865828092 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.0568208644 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.466666667 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44077779572 0.236089414692 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20116781045 0.076458572812 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920105583303 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331823381992 0.150856017488 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420896318945 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.